Brief Neuropsychological Cognitive Examination Pdf To Word Pdf
Brief Neuropsychological Cognitive Examination For Children
Brief Neuropsychological Cognitive Examination Pdf To Word Converter

Brief Neuropsychological Cognitive Examination Pdf To Word Pdf

Objectives: To examine the validity and reliability of a brief cognitive screen instrument, the Neuropsychiatry Unit Cognitive Assessment Tool (NUCOG), in patients with dementia, major psychiatric disorders and neurological disorders, and to compare its performance with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Method: The NUCOG was undertaken with the MMSE on a total of 347 individuals, with 82 subjects in the control group and 265 in the patient group. The patient group consisted of patients with dementia (n = 65), non-dementing neurological disorders (n = 44) and psychiatric illness (n = 156). The patient group was further broken into subgroups of dementing and psychiatric disorders for further analysis. A subgroup of patients (n = 22) underwent detailed neuropsychological testing.

Brief Neuropsychological Cognitive Examination For Children

Brief Neuropsychological Cognitive Examination (BNCE). Evaluate the cognitive status of patients - MT50 He is spelling the B-R-I-E-F - Country MT I would think that he does mean BNCE and is wanting you to just put Brief with a capital B exam. Only studies of neuropsychological batteries or tests that evaluated at least three cognitive processes and included tasks with face-to-face or traditional paper-and-pencil administration were analyzed. The final selection included 147 abstracts (73 in PsycINFO and 74 in MEDLINE).

Results: The NUCOG and MMSE scores, which correlated strongly, were highest in the control group, and lowest in the dementia group, with psychiatric and neurological patients scoring similarly. Internal consistency and reliability were high. Scores were significantly affected by age and years of education. How to be an embedded software engineer quora. Mysql import sql file command line utf 8. The NUCOG differentiated the four broad groups and the dementia subgroups more strongly than the MMSE. The NUCOG subscale scores correlated strongly with most neuropsychological subtests undertaken. At a cut-off score of 80/100, sensitivity of the NUCOG for detection of dementia was 0.84 and specificity 0.86.

Conclusions: The NUCOG is a valid and reliable cognitive tool that is sensitive and specific for the detection of dementia. The NUCOG was able to differentiate dementia and psychiatric subgroups which were not able to be discriminated on MMSE scores. The NUCOG appears to be a well-tolerated, reliable and highly useful clinical tool that offers benefits over and above the MMSE.

Keywords

cognitive, neuropsychological, neuropsychiatry, screen, tool

1.	Velakoulis, D, Walterfang, M. The clinical mental status examination. Neurology: basic and clinical neurosciences, Schapira, A , Mosby2007, In press. Google Scholar \| Crossref
2.	Wechsler, D . The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – revised. The Psychological Corporation, New York1981. Google Scholar
3.	Kiernan, R, Mueller, J, Langston, J. The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: a brief but quantitative approach to cognitive assessment. Annals of Internal Medicine 1987; 107: 481–485. Google Scholar \| Crossref \| Medline \| ISI
4.	Mathuranath, P, Nestor, P, Berrios, G. A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2000; 55: 1613–1620. Google Scholar \| Crossref \| Medline \| ISI
5.	Walterfang, M, Velakoulis, D, Gibbs, A. The NUCOG: construction and piloting of a cognitive screening instrument in a neuropsychiatric unit. Australasian Psychiatry 2003; 11: 325–329. Google Scholar \| SAGE Journals
6.	American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders,fourth edition (DSM-IV). AmericanPsychiatric Press, Washington, DC1994. Google Scholar
7.	McKhann, G, Drachman, D, Folstein, M. Clinican diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 1984; 34: 939–944. Google Scholar \| Crossref \| Medline \| ISI
8.	Neary, D, Snowden, J, Gustafson, L. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 1998; 51: 1546–1554. Google Scholar \| Crossref \| Medline \| ISI
9.	Roman, G, Tatemichi, T, Erkinjuntti, T. Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies. Report of the NINDSAIREN International Workshop Neurology 1993; 43: 250–260. Google Scholar
10.	Petersen, R, Smith, G, Waring, S. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of Neurology 1999; 56: 303–308. Google Scholar \| Crossref \| Medline
11.	Sheehan, D, Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, K. The Mini- International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1998; 59: S22–S33. Google Scholar \| Medline \| ISI
12.	Folstein, M, Folstein, S, McHugh, P. ‘Mini Mental State’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatrics Research 1975; 12: 189–198. Google Scholar \| Crossref \| Medline \| ISI
13.	Wechsler, D . Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – third edition: technical manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX1997. Google Scholar
14.	Wechsler, D . Wechsler Memory Scale – revised manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX1987. Google Scholar
15.	Reitan, R . Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Motor Skills 1958; 8: 271–276. Google Scholar \| SAGE Journals
16.	Osterrieth, P . A test of copying a complex figure: a contribution to the study of perception and memory. Archives de Psychologie (Geneva) 1944; 30: 205–220. Google Scholar
17.	Benton, A, Hamsher, K, Sivan, A. Multilingual aphasia examination3rd edn. A